[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too
|
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:09:15 -0400 |
> The (UW) Alpine equivalent is the 'alt-adresses' construct. BSD Mail
> and SysV mailx both had equivalent settings as I recall.
Sigh. My only point was ... if address@hidden is not, in fact, a
valid email address for you, you'd be better served by changing
Local-Mailbox. It does more things (things you'd likely want) than
Alternate-Mailboxes does.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Robert Elz, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Paul Fox, 2014/03/26
Message not availableRe: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26