[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:10:43 -0700 |
See the Alternate-Mailboxes entry in the mh-profile(5) manpage. It lets you
specify a list of addresses that should be treated the same as your local
primary address.
Alternate-Mailboxes: address@hidden, bug-mh*
Tells repl and scan which addresses are really yours. In this
way, repl knows which addresses should be included in the reply,
and scan knows if the message really originated from you.
Addresses must be separated by a comma, and the hostnames listed
should be the "official" hostnames for the mailboxes you indi-
cate, as local nicknames for hosts are not replaced with their
official site names. For each address, if a host is not given,
then that address on any host is considered to be you. In addi-
tion, an asterisk (`*') may appear at either or both ends of the
mailbox and host to indicate wild-card matching. (profile,
default: your user-id)
This should do what you want.
--lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Robert Elz, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25