[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too
|
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:59:07 -0700 |
On Mar 25, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Robert Elz <address@hidden> wrote:
> Not really, it is designed to allow multiple different designations
> of addresses that represent me (whoever) so that all purposes, most
> definitely including -nocc me, can recognise what is "me" - whatever
> variant of the address happens to be used.
The (UW) Alpine equivalent is the 'alt-adresses' construct. BSD Mail and SysV
mailx both had equivalent settings as I recall.
--lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Robert Elz, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Paul Fox, 2014/03/26
Message not availableRe: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26