On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 13:09, Paul Vixie
<address@hidden> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:01:04 -0500
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> >Rather than guess, we should treat the absence of a From: header in
> >an outgoing message as a configuration error and abort the send. This
> >change makes the creation of a components file with a 'From:' header
> >mandatory; the code that initializes the Mail/ folder should
> >probably be extended to prompt for a default From address which is
> >then used to create a minimal components file.
>
> So, what do people think of this idea? This would be arguably the
> most correct solution, but it would be a significant change from
> the way nmh has behaved in the past.
i think this is fine. nmh should gradually encourage people to make a
few changes here and there.
If we are going to change the behavior in any significant way then we should make it a major release (i.e. 2.0).
Thanks
Jeff
--
Jeffrey C. Honig <
address@hidden>
http://www.honig.net/jchGnuPG ID:14E29E13 <
http://www.honig.net/jch/key.shtml>