[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev TRST & lynxcgi
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev TRST & lynxcgi |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 19:35:45 +0900 (JST) |
> By default, the behavior is just as for http URLs - no explicit cache
> control (by Cache-control or other forms) means it gets cached, whether
> there happens to be a CGI script behind it or not.
[...]
> (I mean normal rendered-document caching -
Yes, that's what I was talking about. Thanks for helping me get this
set right in my mind. (I had a sneaking suspicion, but ...)
__Henry
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : the next step, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : the next step, Philip Webb, 1999/11/17
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : the next step, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/17
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : the next step, Philip Webb, 1999/11/17
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : the next step, pg, 1999/11/17
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : the next step, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : the next step, Philip Webb, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : see LHFB, Doug Kaufman, 1999/11/13
- lynx-dev less/most, Philip Webb, 1999/11/14
- Re: lynx-dev TRST : see LHFB, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/17
- lynx-dev (off-topic) less/most (was TRST), Philip Webb, 1999/11/17
Re: lynx-dev TRST & lynxcgi,
Henry Nelson <=