Re: lynx-dev where is 2.8.2???

[dickey]

> > since the only other comments about the .po files were (a) that they're 
> > not up to date and (b) that they shouldn't be in the release anyway, I 
> > overlooked the ones you're describing. 
>  
> lynxcfg_toc.html and lynxcfg.html are version dependent also. 
> It is a wrong decision to not include them into the distribution. 
It would be a wrong decision to include them when the tools are dependent
on particular versions, not portable (that's what I said originally, and
also did say I would work to lessen that problem).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey