[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:50:35 +0200 (CEST) |
>>> <des> is perfectly repeatable by q.
>>
>> Do we have this in the docs?
>
> I don't think explicitly, but why wouldn't it work?.
Whether it works is not the question, but rather that people don't
have this in mind while looking for a repetition possibility of a
single note. Even I, being quite well aware of the `q' business,
couldn't answer that as quickly as you.
Werner
- Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Jim Long, 2012/09/19
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/19
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Graham Percival, 2012/09/20
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Jim Long, 2012/09/20
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/21
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/21
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20