[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:45:41 +0200 |
Le 20 sept. 2012 à 19:21, Graham Percival a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:56:02PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Jim Long <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Please educate me if there is already a way to do this, but it
>>> appears that 'q' as a shorthand for the repetition of the
>>> previous note(s) only works for chords. It would be handy if it
>>> worked for single notes also, specifically in ties.
>>
>> A single note name is not that much longer to type than q. If it is
>> really important to you, place the single note in a chord:
>> <des> is perfectly repeatable by q.
>
> What would we lose if every note was automatically a (single-note)
> chord?
That behavior is intended, so that you can write:
c <e g c'> g q c q g q
And the idea, if you wanted to repeat the previous single note, is
to enclose it between < >.
q repeats the last chord, not the last note. That's why it's named
chord repetition symbol.
Nicolas
- Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Jim Long, 2012/09/19
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/19
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Graham Percival, 2012/09/20
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Jim Long, 2012/09/20
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/21
- Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/21
Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20