[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
From: |
immanuel litzroth |
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
Date: |
Sun, 18 May 2008 10:55:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 |
Quoting Hans Aberg <address@hidden>:
> On 18 May 2008, at 15:16, immanuel litzroth wrote:
>
> >> So the C language itself does not
> >> have any #include directive.
The C language standard is available at:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
You'll see all the preprocessing directives explained there and no mention of a
separate preprocessor program. The introduction does say: "A C program need not
all be translated at the same time".
> This is probably just to define the language semantics.
That's my point, semantically the inclusion models are the same.
Haskell does not define how modules are mapped to files, how they are searched
for and how to "figure out" what to include in a compilation. These are
implementation issues.
Immanue
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a free email account with anti spam protection.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/2
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, (continued)
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Graham Percival, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/18
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
immanuel litzroth <=
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/19
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/19
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/19
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/19
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/05/19
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/19
- Haskell module design [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Trevor Daniels, 2008/05/19
- Re: Haskell module design, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/19