Haskell module design [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi]

[Trevor Daniels]

Hans Aberg wrote

> My hope was to get to the discussion of using in Lilypond Haskell  like a 
> "import" construct, which I think might help LilyPond users,  as opposed 
> to the current "\include", which I think is more like the  C preprocessor 
> "#include", and is trickier to use.

Is this an offer to write the code necessary to incorporate the Haskell 
module design into LilyPond?  If not, why discuss it?

Trevor