[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
Date: |
Sat, 17 May 2008 23:17:51 +0200 |
On 17 May 2008, at 22:52, immanuel litzroth wrote:
Haskell does not "deduce" what to include. You have to explicitly
import each module or no magic happens. Can't really see the big
difference with #include "stdio.h" and import Unix.
C is composed of two languages: the preprocessor, to which #include
belongs, and merely composes the files into one compile unit, and the
C compiler, which processes that. So the C language itself does not
have any #include directive. This setup makes it impossible for the C
language to deduce module dependencies the way Haskell does, which
causes the complicated setup of the compiler. And of course, in
Haskell, one needs to tell which modules to import.
Hans
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, (continued)
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Michael David Crawford, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Graham Percival, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/18
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/18
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/19
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/19
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/19
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/19
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/05/19