[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Freezing for 2.18
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Freezing for 2.18 |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:41:27 +0100 |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:37 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Add some doc updates and translations if they are available, or make
>> them known issues if not. As Janek says, anything else goes into a
>> branch.
>
> That's exactly what the disagreement is about. This "anything else goes
> into a branch" is not a requirement as long as we are not shaping up for
> an eventual stable release.
Ah, you mean that the disagreement is /only/ about whether we should
flip the switch (make a branch) now or later?
If so, i'd say we can do this now. Let's see what Mike will say.
cheers,
Janek
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, (continued)
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/10
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, address@hidden, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Colin Hall, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/11
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, Graham Percival, 2013/03/12
- Re: Freezing for 2.18, David Kastrup, 2013/03/12
Re: Freezing for 2.18, Marc Hohl, 2013/03/10