[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
Date: |
Sun, 06 May 2012 10:36:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>
>> David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
>>
>> >In fact, isn't <> generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
>> >in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
>>
>> Definitely prettier, but maybe not so transparent as s1*0.
>
> +1
>
> What about defining a
> null
> or
> n
> "note name"? Then we could write
> c4 n\footnote
What's the duration of
<c n>
?
What is the duration of
n4
?
Where is the point in a note name that does not take to the current
duration? How is that making things simpler?
--
David Kastrup
Re: Substitute for s1*0, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06