[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Substitute for s1*0
|
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
|
Subject: |
Re: Substitute for s1*0 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 6 May 2012 16:45:09 +0200 |
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> In fact, isn't <> generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using
>>> it in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
>>
>> What a great idea! No notes generated; the duration doesn't
>> change.
>
> Indeed! I wasn't aware that <> is valid syntax at all.
+1