Re: follow-up to report 22

[Graham Percival]

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:36:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I don't think it's worth delaying 2.14 in order to debate either of these
> questions.  Can't we just note that the debate exists, perhaps add it to our
> list of GLISS topics, and move on to getting 2.14 out?

It's not a GLISS (syntax) topic; it's a GOP (general organization)
topic.  And it's already noted:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-10/msg00404.html
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/policy.html

The formalizing of hackers is, appropriately enough, topic
  3. Hackers A


Cheers,
- Graham