Re: follow-up to report 22

[Carl Sorensen]

On 11/5/10 7:49 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:36:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> I don't think it's worth delaying 2.14 in order to debate either of these
>> questions.  Can't we just note that the debate exists, perhaps add it to our
>> list of GLISS topics, and move on to getting 2.14 out?
> 
> It's not a GLISS (syntax) topic; it's a GOP (general organization)
> topic.  And it's already noted:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-10/msg00404.html
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/policy.html
> 
> The formalizing of hackers is, appropriately enough, topic
>   3. Hackers A
> 

Great!  Let's move on, OK?  If Valentin wants to patch the documentation,
then he can propose a patch.  The same applies to anyone else who wants to
propose a patch.

Thanks,

Carl