[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: follow-up to report 22
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: follow-up to report 22 |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:29:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> writes:
> situation (and again: like David, I am not referring to the division
> between people who are subscribed to -hackers and other people, but
> between those who "know" about it and those who do not).
David seemingly is quite incapable of bringing his meaning across, so
instead of substituting your own, just quote him.
That way, the results are just his own fault without additional
multipliers increasing the confusion he spreads.
All the best,
--
David Kastrup
- Re: follow-up to report 22, (continued)
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Graham Percival, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Graham Percival, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Joe Neeman, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Joe Neeman, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/06
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/07
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/05