lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: follow-up to report 22


From: Reinhold Kainhofer
Subject: Re: follow-up to report 22
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:37:29 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-22-generic; KDE/4.5.2; i686; ; )

Am Donnerstag, 4. November 2010, um 21:56:24 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
> > 2) Agree that an OSS project can, in theory, have a private
> > mailing list.  And apologize.
> 
> *sigh* I do apologize if you felt offended (which you obviously do).
> However, I can assure you that my goal is not to make you feel that
> way.
> Please also note that, whilst I may on occasion feel like there's a
> lack of respect towards some people in the community, I am constantly
> taking into account the fact that I am probably overly sensitive, and
> thus I haven't been demanding any apology or whatever.
[...] 
> (OK, non-grumpy version now.) Have you read my last comment? What I
> take issue with is not the fact that private MLs exist, but the fact
> that, in the LilyPond project, nobody has ever bothered telling people
> about it. (At least, from where I'm standing.)

I'm actually a member of that list, but I wasn't even aware of it (well, I now 
remember that I joined it a while ago, but have since forgotten it 
completely). So I don't think that any ill-will is involved or anything. I 
would rather think that nobody was thinking about that hacker list, since it 
is so low traffic (e.g. 2010 has 4 messages in 1 thread, 2008 has 11 messages 
in 2 threads). 

The archives show that in 2010 only September had some messages (4 mails to 
the list), which are all titled "lilypond-hackers revival"...

And before that, in October/November 2009 there were some mails about how to 
handle someone, who back then didn't really show proper behavior. Such things 
should IMO not be part of a public mailing list, as they are really sensitive 
topics and might harm a person's reputation if they are available for the 
whole world to read in Google etc.

The existence of such a list only becomes relevant (and one only remembers it) 
when there is a sensitive topic to be discussed, which should not be available 
for the whole public to be misunderstood. See also Graham's explanation in 
http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg30917.html

Cheers,
Reinhold

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]