[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r"
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:45:13 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) |
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Johannes Schindelin <address@hidden>:
>
> > It actually worked here, twice.
> >
> > But you have this wonderful output field in the GUI, what does it have to
> > say? I imagine that it gave you some error message or some such (probably
> > due to an older Git version that refuses to update the current 'master'
> > branch -- which has no commit yet, though).
>
> Sorry, I should of course have posted the output in the first place:
>
> ==>
> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/username/lilypond/.git/
> >From git://repo.or.cz/lilypond
> * [new branch] master -> origin/master
> warning: You appear to be on a branch yet to be born.
> warning: Forcing checkout of origin/master.
> Already on "master"
> Branch master set up to track remote branch refs/remotes/origin/master.
> <==
>
> So it doesn't give an error, just a warning. But AFAIR I have seen this
> warning on my non-GUI-based checkouts, too, even though everything
> worked fine. BTW, my git version is 1.6.0.4 (the latest one that Ubuntu
> 9.04 has to offer).
Ouch, I think I know what happened. Git used your _current_ working
directory as work tree. So you have some stray LilyPond files lying
around somewhere.
> > So I would like to ask you two things: first, what was the error message
> > (there must have been one), and second: could you change the
> >
> > git checkout -b master origin/master
> >
> > to
> >
> > git reset --hard origin/master
> > git config branch.master.remote origin
> > git config branch.master.merge refs/heads/master
> >
> > ?
>
> Still no luck. :-( The warning is gone, but the result is as before
> (directory is empty, 'git status' reports deleted files). Here is the
> output of the new script:
>
> ==>
> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/username/lilypond/.git/
> >From git://repo.or.cz/lilypond
> * [new branch] master -> origin/master
> HEAD is now at 00c6cac Nitpick: ly:spanner-bound grob name slur -> spanner.
> <==
I do not know why it worked here, but you may need to add the command line
option --work-tree=$lily_dir/.. in the "git" function.
> P.S.: It would be nice to let the script print a short message when
> it's finished so that the user know when to stop waiting. ;-)
Heh. You can easily add that by refactoring the write_to_output function
thusly:
proc write_to_output {string} {
.output.text insert insert $string
.output.text see end
}
proc write_file_to_output {f} {
if {[eof $f]} {
global git_command
fconfigure $f -blocking true
if {[catch {close $f} err]} {
tk_messageBox -type ok -message "Git aborted: $err"
}
unset git_command
} else {
write_to_output [read $f 24]
}
}
You need to replace the callback with write_file_to_output, of course, and
at the end of the Git commands, you can say
write_to_output "Done."
Ciao,
Dscho
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", (continued)
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r",
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Francisco Vila, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10