[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r"
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:02:33 +0200 |
Le lundi 10 août 2009 à 00:56 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> After spending a while reading and re-reading your addition to the
> CG git stuff, it sounds like this only applies to translated docs
> -- i.e. as long as I don't mess with anything in de/ es/ fr/ etc/,
> it's safe to "git pull -r".
This is even broader: as long as you don't touch committishes in files
in de/ es/ fr/ etc., it's safe to "git pull -r". This distinction is
important, because doc contributors and developers are supposed to edit
docs in all languages in some cases, but after thinking again about it,
I needn't ask people other than translators and me to mess up with
committishes.
> Is that correct? If so, I'll amend the warning to begin
> "translators: if you have changed committishes..."
You may amend this paragraph anyway.
Cheers,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", (continued)
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Francisco Vila, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r",
John Mandereau <=
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10