[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken refs
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: Broken refs |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:46:33 +0200 |
2009/8/6 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> As for the "one big HTML" docs, I'd suggest that it @ref to the
> splitted general html. That said, I've never been a fan of the
> "one big html" stuff, so if anybody who uses that wants to argue
> that we *should* create one big general.html... and if that person
> wants to patch the init script or whatever so that we generate
> such a file... then I won't object.
I'm not sure to understand it well. A reader of the big page does not
want him to be taked off from there to a splitted page, but rather
stay on the document him/her is reading. Unless we could easily switch
between big to splitted and vice versa just by means of 1-click(TM)
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
www.csmbadajoz.com
- Broken refs, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, Graham Percival, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, John Mandereau, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, Graham Percival, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: Broken refs, Graham Percival, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, John Mandereau, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, Graham Percival, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, John Mandereau, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, John Mandereau, 2009/08/06
- Re: Broken refs, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/06