[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
small staff massacre
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
small staff massacre |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:27:11 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
>
> I've seldom seen so many bugs in a single example :-)
>
:)
thanks for the report.
> % This file shows problems with staves having different sizes in lilypond
> % CVS 2004-01-21 07:19 MET.
> %
> % . There should be a mechanism to give the staff size in a \with {...}
> % block with a single command, covering all parameters. Perhaps a
> % new `set-staff-size' scheme function?
Possibly - I don't consider this high priority.
> % . Current documentation says that changing the `fontSize' and
> % `StaffSymbol' properties is sufficient. Unfortunately, it is not:
> %
> % 1. Note positions in chords are not computed correctly. There seems
> % to be a problem to decide which is `up' and which is `down'.
Strange, cannot duplicate.
> % 2. ledger lines are not reduced in size.
Fixed.
> % 3. The parameters to `extra-offset' aren't scaled properly.
This is intentional. Extra-offset is a global mechanism that is
supposed to work for arbitrary objects.
We could change this, though.
> % 4. Rests under beams have incorrect offsets; this may be a consequence
> % of bug 3. [The vertical position of the rest in the normally sized
> % staff is incorrect also -- it is too high and should be put as near
> % to the original position as possible.]
fixed.
> % 5. Stems under beams are too short. Another consequence of 3.?
Hmm. have to look into this.
> % 7. Dynamics are too big.
fixed
> % 8. The crescendo gap is too big.
fixed.
> % 9. Tuplet brackets are too big.
fixed.
> % 10. I'm not sure whether the thickness of staff lines really should be
> % the same in both the bigger and the smaller staff. Thicker than
> % normal is correct, but that thick? The problem is that the
> % thickness of beams must be smaller; this reduces the contrast
> % between beams and staff lines.
Check out a good quality pocket score. They have the same line thickness
for small staffs. For my baerenreiter Brahm serenade no 1, the
thickness indeed is 1/5th of staffspace.
> % 11. A similar problem for stems. The stem thickness is too big IMHO
> % compared to note heads.
fixed.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
small staff massacre, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/21