[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Porrectus (continued)
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Porrectus (continued) |
Date: |
16 Jan 2002 21:58:45 +0100 |
Rune Zedeler <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes. We have to figure this out before someone starts hacking in Jurgens
> first patch.
Indeed.
> Btw I'm making quite some changes atm, hopefully it's okay to add them
> upon Jurgens patch?
Hmm, isn't that a bit contradictory to your previous statement?
> (As I said, currently in 600dpi there is no
> difference between the feta-whole rest and the simple \vrule-whole rest
> - both are perfect rectangles).
Anyway, some things are not at all what they're supposed to be:
* Ledger of block rests ledger is too round (much rounder than blot)
* Block part of block rest has sharp edges (no blot), although seems
to be drawn with blot-diameter sized pen. Huh?
* Current ledger seems fine (blot-diameter), Jurgens' current is
not, but things are a mess as it is. However, things should
change for the better, not get worse...
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: [PATCH] Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/03
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Juergen Reuter, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/07
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued),
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/01/31
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/31