Re: [libcvd-members] FAST corner detection--- RFC

[Edward Rosten]

> > Does anyone ever use FAST corners without nonmax? I think that nonmax 
> > suppression should be the default operation. Is there a good reason to 
> > provide non nonmax functions?
>
> Yes, I do. I initialise my features on max locations, then run detection on 
> all cornery regions.

Interesting.

How about having

fast_corner_detect_XX()

and

fast_corner_detect_XX_nonmax()



> Sounds cool. In my experience the SSE detection has occasionally been a bit 
> haphazard in the configure script - it'd be nice to have a way of knowing

How so? What machines does it fail on?

> that you are in fact getting the SCREAMING SIMD version if you want it. 
> Currently, the compile brekage if you don't accomplishes that.

How so? It's supposed to use non SSE versions if it doesn't detect it.


-Ed