|
From: | Edward Rosten |
Subject: | [libcvd-members] FAST corner detection--- RFC |
Date: | Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:54:25 -0600 (MDT) |
After a comment from Georg a while back, I now believe that the "max threshold for which point is still a corner" is a better way of doing the corner score.
Does anyone ever use FAST corners without nonmax? I think that nonmax suppression should be the default operation. Is there a good reason to provide non nonmax functions?
We have about 1e6 FAST detector functions. Ethan has contributed faster_* which are the fastest versions and are exact. I now have non SSE versions which are also exact (not yet in CVS). I'm planning on merging these in to:
fast_corner_detect_?with the configure script selecting the version. Also, since they're now all exact, the original fast_corner_detect function can go.
The changes are small, but will probably cause minor breakage. Comments? -Ed
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |