[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: API for introduction of bindings
From: |
Mikael Djurfeldt |
Subject: |
Re: API for introduction of bindings |
Date: |
18 Dec 2000 18:06:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 |
address@hidden writes:
> At 17 Dec 2000 20:00:38 +0100,
> Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> >
> > I suggest that we instead focus on the problem of dividing the current
> > set of bindings into a nice hierarchy of modules, like
> > "(core safe-r5rs)", "(core r5rs)", etc. (I think Maciej and Jim had a
> > preliminary proposal, Maciej? Jim?)
>
> I'd prefer modules like "(core list)", "(core string)", etc. according
> to their functionality rather than standards. We can build standard
> modules like "(scheme r5rs)" by importing the core modules and exporting
> necessary bindings, right?
That's certainly possible.
Is this useful? (It's not meant as a rhetoric question.)
- scm_system_environment, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/15
- Re: scm_system_environment, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/15
- scm_system_environment - OK, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/16
- Re: scm_system_environment - OK, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/12/17
- Re: scm_system_environment - OK, Marius Vollmer, 2000/12/17
- Re: scm_system_environment - OK, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/17
- API for introduction of bindings, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/12/17
- Re: API for introduction of bindings, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/12/18
- Re: API for introduction of bindings, kxn30, 2000/12/18
- Re: API for introduction of bindings,
Mikael Djurfeldt <=
- Re: API for introduction of bindings, Michael Livshin, 2000/12/18
- Re: API for introduction of bindings, Martin Grabmueller, 2000/12/18