Re: API for introduction of bindings

[kxn30]

At 17 Dec 2000 20:00:38 +0100,
Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> 
> I suggest that we instead focus on the problem of dividing the current
> set of bindings into a nice hierarchy of modules, like
> "(core safe-r5rs)", "(core r5rs)", etc.  (I think Maciej and Jim had a
> preliminary proposal, Maciej? Jim?)

I'd prefer modules like "(core list)", "(core string)", etc. according
to their functionality rather than standards.  We can build standard
modules like "(scheme r5rs)" by importing the core modules and exporting
necessary bindings, right?

-- Kei