[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:01:20 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>
> [mixed tag/commit versions vs. update]
I'll be curt because I _am_ still in the middle of the move (projected
to be essentially done by the last week of april! :-). If I blow off
something critical, please re-raise the topic in 2 weeks.
I understand you to be saying that `update' should better handle mixed
versions _or_ mixed versions should be prohibited.
Prohibiting mixed versions is not an option. They are quite useful.
To choose an extreme example, in a version that exists only to be used
with `get', they are clearly handy.
Better handling mixed versions in update is, afaict, an ill-defined
problem. What "better" means depends on how you are using the mixed
version. There is no single correct answer. So, I just want to
pick, from among the possible answers that give the right result in a
non-mixed version, one that is simple to explain, understand, and
implement efficiently.
There is a bogosity I'm surprised you haven't brought up. Currently,
the result produced by `update' _for_a_mixed_version_ is
non-deterministic. It depends on the state of your revision
libraries. _Perhaps_ that should be fixed.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Tom Lord, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Tom Lord, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Tom Lord, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Benoit Poulot-Cazajous, 2004/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Tom Lord, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Brian May, 2004/04/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Tom Lord, 2004/04/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: <<< conflict markers, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/15