Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Seeing before applying

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 14:52, Miles Bader wrote:
> Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
> > how about instead just making 'tla delta' with no arguments compute a
> > delta between the current tree version and the latest archive
> > revision?
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me, e.g.:
> 
>    tla delta       =>   tla delta . `tla missing -f | tail -1`


 ==  tla changes


> What about `tla delta' with only one arg?  It might make sense to
> just default the missing arg to `.', but it could go in either
> location.  Something like:
> 
>    tla delta REV   =>  tla delta REV .
> 
> Seems good to me though (e.g., using one arg defaults to showing changes
> from a past-revision to the current tree).

tla changes <past revision>

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part