[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Seeing before applying

[Miles Bader]

Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
> how about instead just making 'tla delta' with no arguments compute a
> delta between the current tree version and the latest archive
> revision?

Sounds reasonable to me, e.g.:

   tla delta       =>   tla delta . `tla missing -f | tail -1`

?

What about `tla delta' with only one arg?  It might make sense to
just default the missing arg to `.', but it could go in either
location.  Something like:

   tla delta REV   =>  tla delta REV .

Seems good to me though (e.g., using one arg defaults to showing changes
from a past-revision to the current tree).

-Miles
-- 
"Unless there are slaves to do the ugly, horrible, uninteresting work, culture
and contemplation become almost impossible. Human slavery is wrong, insecure,
and demoralizing.  On mechanical slavery, on the slavery of the machine, the
future of the world depends." -Oscar Wilde, "The Soul of Man Under Socialism"