[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?
|
From: |
Colin Walters |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:07:08 -0500 |
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 09:48, David MENTRE wrote:
> And you should not
> mess with arch maintained {arch} directory, so why so much fuss about
> bash bug on shell completion?
Not true, you will very often have to edit {arch}/=tagging-method. I
still find the filenames frustrating myself.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] Caching (was: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Caching (was: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?), Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Caching (was: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?), Jan Hudec, 2004/03/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Caching (was: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?), Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Caching (was: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?), Jan Hudec, 2004/03/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Caching (was: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?), Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Caching, Aaron Bentley, 2004/03/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David MENTRE, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?,
Colin Walters <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/07
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/09