[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?
From: |
Yavor Doganov |
Subject: |
[gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free? |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:42:05 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.2 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
Sean Sieger wrote:
>
> And the
> lack of upgrades between stable releases, which basically makes the
> distro unsuitable for serious use.
>
> What's this part mean?
Sorry, sloppy language on my part. I meant the "lack of upgrade
procedure between stable releases".
If you install a stable release of a distro, you ought to be able to
upgrade easily and flawlessly to the next stable release (e.g. from
gNewSense DeltaD -> DeltaH). Reinstalling from scratch is just not an
option.
- [gNewSense-users] VLC is non free?, Ivan Ivanov, 2008/08/04
- Re: [gNewSense-users] VLC is non free?, Benjamin Webb, 2008/08/04
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Yavor Doganov, 2008/08/07
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Ivan Ivanov, 2008/08/07
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Yavor Doganov, 2008/08/07
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Sean Sieger, 2008/08/08
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Bake Timmons, 2008/08/08
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?,
Yavor Doganov <=
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Dara Adib, 2008/08/09
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Karl Goetz, 2008/08/09
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Dara Adib, 2008/08/09
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Yavor Doganov, 2008/08/10
[gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Danny Clark, 2008/08/13