[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup
From: |
Sandro Santilli |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:26:58 +0200 |
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 07:08:11AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> So I'm not the only one that likes to use "Make -C". :-)
I actually change dir into the gui/dump folder and use "make" :)
> > Should we move to recursive GUI/ subdirs instead ? After all each
> > executable is linked separately...
>
> I would think this falls into the category we just discussed, so I was
> assuming non-recursive for gui/*, the same as most of the other
> libraries (and libcore after you make the changes you mentioned)
My point was that gui/* are applications rather than convenience libraries,
so there's nothing to save about handling them in non-recursive way.
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup, Rob Savoye, 2011/04/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup, Andrew Guertin, 2011/04/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup, Rob Savoye, 2011/04/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup, Andrew Guertin, 2011/04/19
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup, Rob Savoye, 2011/04/19
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup, Sandro Santilli, 2011/04/19
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup, Rob Savoye, 2011/04/19
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup,
Sandro Santilli <=
Re: [Gnash-dev] Large-scale Makefile.am cleanup, Andrew Guertin, 2011/04/20