Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1079-ga77b2d1

[Benjamin Wolsey]

>   Clean is a relative term... By rough code I don't mean buggy (needs
> more comments for example). As neither of you runs Gnash in a
> framebuffer, you'd never see those bugs anyway. None of my changes will
> effect the way 99% of gnash users run Gnash from master, that is with
> GTK & AGG on their desktop. So you're basically getting upset about
> something that will likely never effect you at all.

Knowingly introducing bugs for even 1% of users still isn't suitable for
a stable branch! And whether I'm directly "affected" by these changes or
not is also irrelevant: does it mean I shouldn't care about the quality
of code added to Gnash? We all still have to maintain it once it's
there.

bwy

-- 
Free Flash, use Gnash
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/

Benjamin Wolsey, Software Developer - http://benjaminwolsey.de
C++ and Open-Source Flash blog - http://www.benjaminwolsey.de/bwysblog

xmpp:address@hidden
http://identi.ca/bwy

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part