[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invisible
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: invisible |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:29:58 -0600 (CST) |
>From my previous message:
That was stupid, we already have such a variable:
inhibit-point-motion-hooks.
And line-move _already_ binds it to t. So much for that idea. It is
too long ago that I looked at this.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- invisible, 山本和彦, 2004/02/25
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/25
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/25
- Re: invisible, Klaus Zeitler, 2004/02/26
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Miles Bader, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/28
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/28