[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: region-active-p
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: region-active-p |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:11:21 -0400 |
I expect the opposite makes more sense:
(defun region-active-p (&optional allow-empty)
"Return non-nil if the region is active.
Optional argument ALLOW-EMPTY non-nil means that an empty region
may also be considered as active."
...)
This is because in most cases we've seen we want to treat empty regions as
inactive.
I agree this would be better. I made my proposal the way I did
because it is an upward compatible change for XEmacs. But if that is
not a factor in the decision, let's define the argument as you suggest.
- Re: region-active-p, (continued)
- Re: region-active-p, Johan Bockgård, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p, Miles Bader, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/29
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, David Kastrup, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/31
- RE: region-active-p, Drew Adams, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/30