[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: region-active-p
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: region-active-p |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:22:27 -0400 |
If you plan to use this API generally in Emacs, then I guess XEmacs
compatibility is a secondary consideration. If so I would prefer that
you use a different name and the semantics for the argument that
Stefan proposed
I'm not wedded to any particular name.
Possible names are `region-usable-p' and `region-nonempty-p'.
Neither one fits quite right. Whether the region is active is more
central to the meaning than whether it is nonempty.
Perhaps `region-overrides-p' is a good name. The decision is whether
the region should override the normal meaning of the command.
I invite other suggestions.
- Re: region-active-p, (continued)
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/29
- Re: region-active-p,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: region-active-p, David Kastrup, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/31
- RE: region-active-p, Drew Adams, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/30
- RE: region-active-p, Drew Adams, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/30
- RE: region-active-p, Drew Adams, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, Miles Bader, 2007/10/30
- Re: region-active-p, David Kastrup, 2007/10/31