[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:08:40 +0200 |
On 02 Jul 2002 22:46:36 +0100, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> wrote:
> Even better, test for features, not for version numbers.
Sure, but what when you need to detect a change in some interface? (For
example, that a function now admits a few more arguments). There's no
feature there.
Sometimes you just need to know the release, or do fancy tricks like
(require 'cl)
(unless (ignore-errors (whatever-func 1 2 3) t)
(whatever-func 1 2))
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05