[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
02 Jul 2002 17:06:03 +0900 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Alternatively, we could adapt the linux numbering where odd-minor are
> development versions and even-minor are releases, e.g.
What would be the point of that? As far as I can tell, emacs simply doesn't
have `development releases', except for the flurry of quick releases for
pretesting. For those, I think the current scheme, of using high-numbered
minor versions, is much better than the scheme linux uses.
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/01
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/07/01
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/04