Re: mulle-objc #MakeObjCGreatAgain

[Edwin Ancaer]

I humbly apologize.

Would it be better if I rephrase as:

> And imagine that for a popular Linux distribution there is a packaged
> version for GNUstep (base, make, gui & back) made with mulle-objc compiler  and
> mulle obj-c runtime
> And then again, imagine I packaged my application for this distribution, but
> with the clang compiler/etoilé runtime;

because if they do not cooperate, you're cutting in half instead of making great, as far as I'm concerned.
>

2016-12-02 15:47 GMT+01:00 Liam Proven <lproven@gmail.com>:

On 2 December 2016 at 15:04, Edwin Ancaer <eancaer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have experience with this kind of varied environments, so this might
> be a stupid question...
>
> let's imagine I created this wonderful application with GNUstep.
> And imagine that for a popular Linux distribution there is a packaged
> version for GNUstep (base, make, gui & back) made with compiler A and
> runtime A.
> And then again, imagine I packaged my application for this distibution, but
> with Compiler B/Runtime B ;
>
> If someone used the package manager to install GNUstep and my application,
> would this be guaranteed to be working?


You really should not hijack someone else's thread.

Start a new one with its own subject line.

--
Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven@cix.co.uk • Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven@gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven • Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 • ČR/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep