[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Classpathx-discuss] Re: servlet code
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
[Classpathx-discuss] Re: servlet code |
Date: |
15 Jun 2001 16:23:30 -0600 |
>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <address@hidden> writes:
Per> However, having the extensions packages separate means having to
Per> resolve the library search rules. I.e. does the programmer need
Per> to specify explicit CLASSPATH (when compiling) or -l (when
Per> linking) to get the extension library? This is a somewhat
Per> controversial issue.
What is the controversy again?
I think when searching for .class files we ought to follow whatever
javac does. javac compatibility is a longstanding goal, and I think
it is a reasonable one.
Tom