[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AC_SEARCH_LIBS and non-cdecl calling conventions (was: pkg-config wisdom
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
AC_SEARCH_LIBS and non-cdecl calling conventions (was: pkg-config wisdom) |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:00:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-09) |
* Matěj Týč wrote on Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 03:05:26PM CET:
> There is one big issue with AC_SEARCH_LIBS: If you use a different
> calling convention than cdecl (like stdcall, but I don't know, they've
> just told me), you will get unresolved symbols if you try to link
> without a proper include file (or something like that). Which means you
> can't rely on that macro, especially when it concerns Windows libraries.
> This is quite catastrophic, isn't it? What else than pkg-config would be
> the proper solution of this?
Is there a generic way to check for a library function with such a
different calling convention without knowing the function declaration,
nor the header(s) needed to declare it?
IOW, does Autoconf have a chance to implement such a check with the
information it is given now, or is another API needed?
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: pkg-config wisdom, (continued)
Re: pkg-config wisdom, Matěj Týč, 2009/10/25
- AC_SEARCH_LIBS and non-cdecl calling conventions (was: pkg-config wisdom),
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: pkg-config wisdom, John Calcote, 2009/10/26
- Re: pkg-config wisdom, Matěj Týč, 2009/10/26
- AC_SEARCH_LIBS and non-cdecl calling conventions (was: pkg-config wisdom), Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/26
- Re: AC_SEARCH_LIBS and non-cdecl calling conventions (was: pkg-config wisdom), Matěj Týč, 2009/10/27
- Re: AC_SEARCH_LIBS and non-cdecl calling conventions, John Calcote, 2009/10/27
- Re: AC_SEARCH_LIBS and non-cdecl calling conventions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/27
- Re: AC_SEARCH_LIBS and non-cdecl calling conventions, John Calcote, 2009/10/28