Re: [AUCTeX-devel] This ascender bug in dvipng mode...

[David Kastrup]

Jan-Åke Larsson <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>>>The special would be "!(preview 0.9.1)pop...", right?
>> I guess so.  We can also make this two specials.  I think that
>> !(tightpage)pop
>> alone should be pretty unlikely to occur unintended...
>
> I've already coded for "!(preview version-string)pop(tightpage)pop..."
> But not checked it in.
>
>>  It is not
>> pretty.  "safe" is the wrong word for it, I guess, but at least with
>> the current history there should not be problems.
>
> Nevermind, I am just fuzzy in the head. I'll use the whole string
> (old and new version) and the spanking new version-identifier as
> above. But if you want, you can change it still.

Does this cover all of our history?  Just two different versions?
Could you give me the whole old string you match so that I can make it
appear for, say, one year or so explicitly?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum