Re: Having the same contents on gnu.org and sf.net

[Guido Draheim]

Peter Simons wrote:
> Guido Draheim writes:
> 
>  >> I am sorry, but I don't understand the problem. Why is this
>  >> difficult?
> 
>  > How to build the tarball. [...] The best way to calm down
>  > my FUD is to show me your build system allowing me to
>  > check how I can put my things in, how can I use it
>  > offsite, and thus finally allowing me to drop sfnet.
> 
> Alright, I see your point. So if you don't want both
> archives to build from the same macro repository right now,
> perhaps a more lightweight approach is better.
> 
> Since you do have CVS commit rights on gnu.org, would you
> mind adding those experimental macros you have in the sf.net
> repository into Savannah, too? sf.net does have all contents
> from gnu.org, but the reverse is not true. Getting that
> fixed is no big deal, but it's another step into the right
> direction.
> 

Into additional subdirectories? Do we have @category working on
your formatting pipeline? How do you handle per-person
subdirectories a.k.a. per-person experimental categories?

(On sfnet the per-person categories are always listed after the
 official ones - they are differentiated by the official categories
 to start with bigcaps while the experimental categories of users
 have the unix username starting smallcaps. The formatting pipeline
 will add an -'s- i.e. "guidod's macros" to the latter which makes
 it even more prominent. The "obsoleted" category is ensure to have
 the least sort priority in the category listing. There is no
 limited set of category names - everything works, everything was
 sorted fine.)

cheers,
-- guido                                  http://google.de/search?q=guidod
GCS/E/S/P C++/++++$ ULHS L++w- N++@ s+:a d(+-) r+@>+++ y++ 5++X- (geekcode)