[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate
From: |
Alexandru Csete |
Subject: |
Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:15:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 |
Quoting Nate Bargmann <address@hidden>:
> * Joop Stakenborg <address@hidden> [2007 Feb 22 12:44 -0600]:
> > I have tried different hamlib settings (serial_speed and stop_bits)
> > for the latest xlog version. My rig normally operates at 57600 with
> > one stop bit. I have set it to some odd value: 4800 Baud and 2 stop bits.
> >
> > The appropriate line in ~/.xlog/preferences.xml now reads:
> > <rigconf>serial_speed=4800,stop_bits=2</rigconf>
> >
> > This works perfectly, no errors!
>
> As it does here. It helps if the dumb operator on this end selects
> Polling! AAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!
>
> How could I miss that? I guess I confused that with the "transceive"
> mode other rigs can be put into. I selected it and all is working
> well (well, the S-meter isn't working, but I'm not sure if I ever coded
> that into the Hamlib backend for the FT-920).
>
> Now, here is an idea for a future version. A button to "suspend"
> Hamlib might be useful to avoid contention when using gmfsk, fldigi, or
> similar. As it seems to work now, if I disable Hamlib support in the
> Preferences dialog, my settings aren't preserved.
Nate, you can just start RPC rig with your FT-920, then xlog, fldigi, gmfsk, ...
with the RPC backend. They will work fine sharing the same rig :-)
Nevertheless, a suspend function could be useful.
73
Alex OZ9AEC
- [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/05
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Joop Stakenborg, 2007/02/06
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/06
- [Xlog-discussion] testing set_conf for Nate, Joop Stakenborg, 2007/02/22
- [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/22
- [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/22
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Joop Stakenborg, 2007/02/23
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate,
Alexandru Csete <=
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/23
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/24