[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate
From: |
Nate Bargmann |
Subject: |
[Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:26:03 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
* Joop Stakenborg <address@hidden> [2007 Feb 22 12:44 -0600]:
> I have tried different hamlib settings (serial_speed and stop_bits)
> for the latest xlog version. My rig normally operates at 57600 with
> one stop bit. I have set it to some odd value: 4800 Baud and 2 stop bits.
>
> The appropriate line in ~/.xlog/preferences.xml now reads:
> <rigconf>serial_speed=4800,stop_bits=2</rigconf>
>
> This works perfectly, no errors!
As it does here. It helps if the dumb operator on this end selects
Polling! AAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!
How could I miss that? I guess I confused that with the "transceive"
mode other rigs can be put into. I selected it and all is working
well (well, the S-meter isn't working, but I'm not sure if I ever coded
that into the Hamlib backend for the FT-920).
Now, here is an idea for a future version. A button to "suspend"
Hamlib might be useful to avoid contention when using gmfsk, fldigi, or
similar. As it seems to work now, if I disable Hamlib support in the
Preferences dialog, my settings aren't preserved.
Someday I'll figure this computer stuff out! *:-/
Sorry for the false alarm. Sigh...
73, de Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998.
http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of
My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!"
http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org
- [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/05
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Joop Stakenborg, 2007/02/06
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/06
- [Xlog-discussion] testing set_conf for Nate, Joop Stakenborg, 2007/02/22
- [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/22
- [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate,
Nate Bargmann <=
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Joop Stakenborg, 2007/02/23
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Alexandru Csete, 2007/02/23
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/23
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/24