[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release
From: |
h . g . muller |
Subject: |
Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:19:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail |
Op Za, 12 maart, 2016 7:11 pm schreef Arun Persaud:
>
> just another quick question. Should I already create a 4.9.x branch and do
> the developer release from there?
>
I am not sure if it still makes sense to maintain separate 'stable' and
'development' branches. This made sense when we were doing large-scale
refactoring in the master branch, which would take a long time to be
presentable, and in the mean time would need a way to fix the occasional
bug that was reported.
For the near feature it seems that we should integrate gtk3 into master,
and that already is in a separate branch. I hardly ever touched the v4.8.x
branch, so I guess we can live without a v4.9.x.
H.G.
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, (continued)
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Arun Persaud, 2016/03/08
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, h . g . muller, 2016/03/09
- Message not available
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Joshua Pettus, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Joshua Pettus, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, h . g . muller, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Joshua Pettus, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, h . g . muller, 2016/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, h . g . muller, 2016/03/09
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Joshua Pettus, 2016/03/09
Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release, Arun Persaud, 2016/03/12
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Development release,
h . g . muller <=