[Targnum-editing] reviewer comments

[the duke]

Hi Moran
(This mail is also sent to the TarGNUm editors list for the skeletons.)

Here are my reviewer's comments on the manifesto , plus a skeleton for 
an aditor comments report, and a skeleton for reviewer's comments.
these last two are needed so it will be easy to see the 
editing/reviewing details. these are first versions, if you think 
something should be added/changed, let me know.

two more comments:

1) use tar.gz format, not Zip, as it is proprietary and deprecated by GNU.
for tar.zg you can do it using cygwin, or any DOS port of gtar you can find.

2) all fixes that the reviewer does (except for very basic typos) has to 
be written in the comments, so that if the editor doesn't agree with 
them he won't have to use them, since he can't find them. actually the 
reviewer doesn't have to fix the document, he can just write comments.

in case of consistant disagreement you can share the problem with others 
editors using the targnum-editing list (see the TarGNUm savannah page). 
in case that doesn't solve the problem, the coordinator can be asked to 
give the final decision (that's why there is a coordinator).

-----
Notice that although the second comment below, I put online the reviewed 
version, since the changes I made has to do with standards, and those 
that have no standards, were only commented on, but not changed. in case 
you disagree with any of the changes, let me know, and we'll see if they 
should be undone.

Being also the translator eliminated comments on phrasing, so I would 
rather a third person to also do a review.

That's all,
what's your next document? (preferably for editing, rather than translation)

salut!
    the duke

manifesto_reviewer_comments.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed

skeleton_reviewer_comments.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed

skeleton_editor_comments.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed