[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy gpl-american-dream.es.html gpl-a...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy gpl-american-dream.es.html gpl-a... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2021 05:03:42 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 21/09/13 05:03:42
Modified files:
philosophy : gpl-american-dream.es.html
gpl-american-way.es.html
historical-apsl.es.html
imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.html
lessig-fsfs-intro.es.html
lest-codeplex-perplex.es.html
linux-gnu-freedom.es.html
microsoft-antitrust.es.html
microsoft-old.es.html
open-source-misses-the-point.es.html
philosophy/po : gpl-american-dream.es-en.html
gpl-american-dream.es.po
gpl-american-way.es-en.html
gpl-american-way.es.po
historical-apsl.es-en.html
historical-apsl.es.po
imperfection-isnt-oppression.es-en.html
imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.po
lessig-fsfs-intro.es-en.html
lessig-fsfs-intro.es.po
lest-codeplex-perplex.es-en.html
lest-codeplex-perplex.es.po
linux-gnu-freedom.es-en.html
linux-gnu-freedom.es.po
microsoft-antitrust.es-en.html
microsoft-antitrust.es.po
microsoft-old.es-en.html microsoft-old.es.po
open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html
open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/gpl-american-dream.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/gpl-american-way.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/historical-apsl.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/lessig-fsfs-intro.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.53&r2=1.54
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/lest-codeplex-perplex.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.43&r2=1.44
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/linux-gnu-freedom.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.55&r2=1.56
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-antitrust.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-old.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.100&r2=1.101
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/gpl-american-dream.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/gpl-american-dream.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/gpl-american-way.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.11&r2=1.12
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/gpl-american-way.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/historical-apsl.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/historical-apsl.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.47&r2=1.48
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.36&r2=1.37
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/linux-gnu-freedom.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/linux-gnu-freedom.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-antitrust.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-antitrust.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.53&r2=1.54
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.132&r2=1.133
Patches:
Index: gpl-american-dream.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/gpl-american-dream.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- gpl-american-dream.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:19 -0000 1.28
+++ gpl-american-dream.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000 1.29
@@ -15,12 +15,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>La GPL de GNU y el «sueño americano»</h2>
<address class="byline">por Bradley M. Kuhn</address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Cuando iba a la escuela, justamente aquÃ, en los Estados Unidos de América,
me enseñaron que nuestro paÃs era la «tierra de las oportunidades». Los
@@ -87,7 +86,6 @@
enseñaron en la escuela. ConfÃo en que no dejemos que Microsoft u otros
cambien la definición.</p>
</div>
-</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -149,7 +147,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:19 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: gpl-american-way.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/gpl-american-way.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- gpl-american-way.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:19 -0000 1.28
+++ gpl-american-way.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000 1.29
@@ -15,12 +15,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>La GPL de GNU y el «estilo americano»</h2>
<address class="byline">por Richard M. Stallman</address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Microsoft describe la Licencia Pública General de GNU (GPL de GNU) como una
licencia de «código abierto», y dice que va contra el «estilo americano»
<a
@@ -150,7 +149,6 @@
la propiedad es fomentar el bienestar humano, no utilizarlo como excusa para
ignorarlo.</p>
</div>
-</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -201,6 +199,22 @@
el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>Copyright © 2001, 2021 Richard M. Stallman</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
@@ -216,7 +230,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:19 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: historical-apsl.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/historical-apsl.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- historical-apsl.es.html 21 Aug 2021 12:33:04 -0000 1.26
+++ historical-apsl.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000 1.27
@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Los problemas de las antiguas versiones de la <cite>Apple Public Source
License (APSL)</cite></h2>
-<div class="comment">
+<div class="announcement">
<p>La versión actual de la <cite>Apple Public Source License (APSL)</cite> no
tiene ninguno de estos problemas. <a href="/philosophy/apsl.html">Puede leer
nuestra posición actual respecto a la APSL en este otro artÃculo</a>. Este
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
</div>
<hr class="thin" />
-<div class="article">
<h3>Posición de la FSF ante las antiguas versiones de la APSL</h3>
<p>
@@ -141,7 +140,6 @@
hecho de que formamos una comunidad cuya finalidad es cooperar en favor del
software como bien común.</p>
</div>
-</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -202,7 +200,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2003, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
@@ -218,7 +216,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/21 12:33:04 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.html 5 Sep 2021 10:06:05 -0000
1.7
+++ imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000
1.8
@@ -121,6 +121,22 @@
el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>Copyright © 2014, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
@@ -136,7 +152,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/09/05 10:06:05 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: lessig-fsfs-intro.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/lessig-fsfs-intro.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.53
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -b -r1.53 -r1.54
--- lessig-fsfs-intro.es.html 5 Sep 2021 10:06:05 -0000 1.53
+++ lessig-fsfs-intro.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000 1.54
@@ -292,6 +292,22 @@
el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>Copyright © 2002, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
@@ -308,7 +324,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/09/05 10:06:05 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: lest-codeplex-perplex.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/lest-codeplex-perplex.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -b -r1.43 -r1.44
--- lest-codeplex-perplex.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:19 -0000 1.43
+++ lest-codeplex-perplex.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000 1.44
@@ -15,12 +15,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Para que CodePlex no te sorprenda</h2>
<address class="byline">por Richard Stallman</address>
-<div class="article">
<p>Muchos en nuestra comunidad sospechamos de la fundación CodePlex. Con su
buró de directores dominado por empleados y ex-empleados de Microsoft, más
el apologista Miguel de Icaza, hay bastantes razones para estar alerta con
@@ -132,7 +131,6 @@
Management">DRM</abbr>, por sus siglas en inglés]; Microsoft continua
dañándonos. SerÃamos imbéciles si dejásemos que algo nos distrajera de
eso.</p>
</div>
-</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -210,7 +208,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:19 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: linux-gnu-freedom.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/linux-gnu-freedom.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.55
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -b -r1.55 -r1.56
--- linux-gnu-freedom.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:20 -0000 1.55
+++ linux-gnu-freedom.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000 1.56
@@ -21,12 +21,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Linux, GNU y la libertad</h2>
<address class="byline">por Richard M. Stallman</address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Dado que en el <a
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190404115541/http://linux.sys-con.com/node/32755";>artÃculo
@@ -239,7 +238,6 @@
href="//directory.fsf.org/project/linux">una versión libre de Linux</a> para
que se pueda usar en distribuciones GNU/Linux.</p>
</div>
-</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -284,6 +282,22 @@
el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>Copyright © 2002, 2021 Richard M. Stallman</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
@@ -299,7 +313,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:20 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: microsoft-antitrust.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-antitrust.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- microsoft-antitrust.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:20 -0000 1.31
+++ microsoft-antitrust.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000 1.32
@@ -15,17 +15,16 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>El software libre y el juicio antimonopolio contra Microsoft</h2>
<div class="thin"></div>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Con el juicio antimonopolio contra Microsoft llegando a su conclusión, se
empieza a plantear la cuestión de qué pedir a Microsoft en caso de que
pierda. Ralph Nader incluso organizó [cuando se escribió este artÃculo, en
marzo de 1999] una conferencia sobre el tema (véase <a
-href="http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/";>http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/</a>).</p>
+href="http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/";>appraising-microsoft.org/</a>).</p>
<p>
Las respuestas obvias de restringir los contratos entre Microsoft y los
fabricantes de ordenadores o de dividir la empresa, no constituirán una
@@ -125,7 +124,6 @@
realmente superior al Windows de Microsoft, en todas aquellas áreas de
Windows que Microsoft no publique como software libre.</p>
</div>
-</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -204,7 +202,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:20 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: microsoft-old.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-old.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- microsoft-old.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:20 -0000 1.16
+++ microsoft-old.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000 1.17
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>¿Es Microsoft el Gran Satanás? (versión antigua)</h2>
<div class="announcement">
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
</div>
<hr class="thin" />
-<div class="article">
<p>Muchos piensan que Microsoft es la amenaza monstruosa de la industria del
software. Incluso hay una campaña para boicotear a Microsoft. Este
sentimiento se ha vuelto más intenso desde que Microsoft comenzó a mostrar
@@ -73,7 +72,6 @@
<p>Gracias, Microsoft, y por favor, quÃtate de en medio.</p>
</div>
-</div>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -149,7 +147,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:20 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.100
retrieving revision 1.101
diff -u -b -r1.100 -r1.101
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:20 -0000
1.100
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:40 -0000
1.101
@@ -15,12 +15,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.es.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.es.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Por qué el «código abierto» pierde de vista lo esencial del software
libre</h2>
<address class="byline">por Richard Stallman</address>
-<div class="article">
<div class="important"><p>
Las expresiones «software libre» y «código abierto» («<cite>open
source</cite>») se refieren aproximadamente al mismo conjunto de
@@ -455,7 +454,6 @@
libre y te brinda libertad!». Cada vez que se dice «software libre» en lugar
de «código abierto» se está apoyando nuestra causa.</p>
<div class="column-limit"></div>
-</div>
<h3 class="footnote">Nota</h3>
@@ -525,6 +523,22 @@
el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
<p>Copyright © 2007, 2010, 2012-2016, 2019-2021 Richard Stallman</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
@@ -541,7 +555,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:20 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:40 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/gpl-american-dream.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/gpl-american-dream.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- po/gpl-american-dream.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:26 -0000 1.12
+++ po/gpl-american-dream.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.13
@@ -10,19 +10,18 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>The GNU GPL and the American Dream</h2>
<address class="byline">by Bradley M. Kuhn</address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
When I was in grade school, right here in the United States of
America, I was taught that our country was the “land of
-opportunity”. My teachers told me that my country was special,
+opportunity.” My teachers told me that my country was special,
because anyone with a good idea and a drive to do good work could make
a living, and be successful too. They called it the “American
-Dream”.</p>
+Dream.”</p>
<p>
What was the cornerstone to the “American Dream”? It was
equality—everyone had the same chance in our society to choose
@@ -31,7 +30,7 @@
<p>
It turned out that I had some talent for working with
computers—in particular, computer software. Indoctrinated with
-the “American Dream”, I learned as much as I could about
+the “American Dream,” I learned as much as I could about
computer software. I wanted my chance at success.</p>
<p>
I quickly discovered though, that in many cases, not all the players in the
@@ -79,7 +78,6 @@
it in grade school. I hope that we won't let Microsoft and others change
the definition.</p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -120,7 +118,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:26 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/gpl-american-dream.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/gpl-american-dream.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- po/gpl-american-dream.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000 1.14
+++ po/gpl-american-dream.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.15
@@ -35,12 +35,6 @@
msgid "by Bradley M. Kuhn"
msgstr "por Bradley M. Kuhn"
-# | When I was in grade school, right here in the United States of America, I
-# | was taught that our country was the “land of [-opportunity”.-]
-# | {+opportunity.”+} My teachers told me that my country was special,
-# | because anyone with a good idea and a drive to do good work could make a
-# | living, and be successful too. They called it the “American
-# | [-Dream”.-] {+Dream.”+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"When I was in grade school, right here in the United States of America, I "
@@ -68,10 +62,6 @@
"propio camino. Yo podÃa elegir cualquier carrera que deseara, y si trabajaba
"
"duro, tendrÃa exito."
-# | It turned out that I had some talent for working with computers—in
-# | particular, computer software. Indoctrinated with the “American
-# | [-Dream”,-] {+Dream,”+} I learned as much as I could about
-# | computer software. I wanted my chance at success.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"It turned out that I had some talent for working with computers—in "
Index: po/gpl-american-way.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/gpl-american-way.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -b -r1.11 -r1.12
--- po/gpl-american-way.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:26 -0000 1.11
+++ po/gpl-american-way.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.12
@@ -10,12 +10,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>The GNU GPL and the American Way</h2>
<address class="byline">by Richard M. Stallman</address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Microsoft describes the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL) as an
“open source” license, and says it is against the American
@@ -36,7 +35,7 @@
cooperation. This is what leads to free enterprise, to free speech,
and to free software.</p>
<p>
-As in “free enterprise” and “free speech”, the
+As in “free enterprise” and “free speech,” the
“free” in “free software” refers to freedom,
not price; specifically, it means that you have the freedom to study,
change, and redistribute the software you use. These freedoms permit
@@ -96,7 +95,7 @@
to close off alternatives for them.</p>
<p>
Microsoft uses an anticompetitive strategy called “embrace and
-extend”. This means they start with the technology others are
+extend.” This means they start with the technology others are
using, add a minor wrinkle which is secret so that nobody else can
imitate it, then use that secret wrinkle so that only Microsoft
software can communicate with other Microsoft software. In some
@@ -132,7 +131,7 @@
once is surely simplistic. To think intelligently about copyrights,
patents or trademarks, you must think about them separately. The
first step is declining to lump them together as “intellectual
-property”.</p>
+property.”</p>
<p>
My views about copyright take an hour to expound, but one general
principle applies: it cannot justify denying the public important
@@ -141,7 +140,6 @@
prevail.” Property rights are meant to advance human well-being,
not as an excuse to disregard it.</p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -172,6 +170,23 @@
information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
<p>Copyright © 2001, 2021 Richard M. Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -182,7 +197,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:26 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/gpl-american-way.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/gpl-american-way.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- po/gpl-american-way.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000 1.16
+++ po/gpl-american-way.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.17
@@ -78,17 +78,6 @@
"lo que conduce a la libre empresa, a la libertad de expresión y al software "
"libre."
-# | As in “free enterprise” and “free [-speech”,-]
-# | {+speech,”+} the “free” in “free software”
-# | refers to freedom, not price; specifically, it means that you have the
-# | freedom to study, change, and redistribute the software you use. These
-# | freedoms permit citizens to help themselves and help each other, and thus
-# | participate in a community. This contrasts with the more common
-# | proprietary software, which keeps users helpless and divided: the inner
-# | workings are secret, and you are prohibited from sharing the program with
-# | your neighbor. Powerful, reliable software and improved technology are
-# | useful byproducts of freedom, but the freedom to have a community is
-# | important in its own right.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"As in “free enterprise” and “free speech,” the "
@@ -218,16 +207,6 @@
"estratégico: no pretende mejorar la informática por el bien de los
usuarios, "
"sino obstaculizarles el acceso a otras alternativas."
-# | Microsoft uses an anticompetitive strategy called “embrace and
-# | [-extend”.-] {+extend.”+} This means they start with the
-# | technology others are using, add a minor wrinkle which is secret so that
-# | nobody else can imitate it, then use that secret wrinkle so that only
-# | Microsoft software can communicate with other Microsoft software. In some
-# | cases, this makes it hard for you to use a non-Microsoft program when
-# | others you work with use a Microsoft program. In other cases, this makes
-# | it hard for you to use a non-Microsoft program for job A if you use a
-# | Microsoft program for job B. Either way, “embrace and extend”
-# | magnifies the effect of Microsoft's market power.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Microsoft uses an anticompetitive strategy called “embrace and extend."
@@ -287,16 +266,6 @@
msgid "Addendum:"
msgstr "Addendum:"
-# | Microsoft says that the GPL is against “intellectual property
-# | rights.” I have no opinion on “intellectual property
-# | rights,” because the term is too broad to have a sensible opinion
-# | about. It is a catch-all, covering copyrights, patents, trademarks, and
-# | other disparate areas of law; areas so different, in the laws and in their
-# | effects, that any statement about all of them at once is surely
-# | simplistic. To think intelligently about copyrights, patents or
-# | trademarks, you must think about them separately. The first step is
-# | declining to lump them together as “intellectual
-# | [-property”.-] {+property.”+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Microsoft says that the GPL is against “intellectual property rights."
Index: po/historical-apsl.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/historical-apsl.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/historical-apsl.es-en.html 21 Aug 2021 12:33:05 -0000 1.4
+++ po/historical-apsl.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.5
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>The Problems with older versions of the Apple Public Source License
(APSL)</h2>
-<div class="comment">
+<div class="announcement">
<p>The current version of the Apple Public Source License (APSL) does not
have any of these problems. <a href="/philosophy/apsl.html">You can
read our current position on the APSL elsewhere</a>. This document is
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
</div>
<hr class="thin" />
-<div class="article">
<h3>FSF Position on the Older Versions of APSL</h3>
<p>
@@ -132,7 +131,6 @@
which is that we form a community to cooperate on the commons of
software.</p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -181,7 +179,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2003, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -191,7 +189,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/21 12:33:05 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/historical-apsl.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/historical-apsl.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- po/historical-apsl.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000 1.20
+++ po/historical-apsl.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.21
@@ -324,10 +324,7 @@
"\">GuÃa para las traducciones</a> para obtener información sobre la "
"coordinación y el envÃo de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web."
-# | Copyright © 1999, 2001, [-2003,-] 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2003, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
msgid "Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
msgstr "Copyright © 1999, 2001, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
Index: po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es-en.html 5 Sep 2021 10:06:08 -0000
1.5
+++ po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000
1.6
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
<p>When a free program lacks capabilities that users want, that is
unfortunate; we urge people to add what is missing. Some would go
further and claim that a program is not even free software if it lacks
- certain functionality — that it denies freedom 0 (the freedom to
+ certain functionality—that it denies freedom 0 (the freedom to
run the program as you wish) to users or uses that it does not
support. This argument is misguided because it is based on
identifying capacity with freedom, and imperfection with oppression.</p>
@@ -102,6 +102,23 @@
of this article.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
<p>Copyright © 2014, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -112,7 +129,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/05 10:06:08 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000
1.9
+++ po/imperfection-isnt-oppression.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000
1.10
@@ -34,13 +34,6 @@
msgid "by <a href=\"http://www.stallman.org/\";>Richard Stallman</a>"
msgstr "por <a href=\"http://www.stallman.org/\";>Richard Stallman</a>"
-# | When a free program lacks capabilities that users want, that is
-# | unfortunate; we urge people to add what is missing. Some would go further
-# | and claim that a program is not even free software if it lacks certain
-# | [-functionality — that-] {+functionality—that+} it denies
-# | freedom 0 (the freedom to run the program as you wish) to users or uses
-# | that it does not support. This argument is misguided because it is based
-# | on identifying capacity with freedom, and imperfection with oppression.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"When a free program lacks capabilities that users want, that is unfortunate; "
Index: po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es-en.html 5 Sep 2021 10:06:09 -0000 1.31
+++ po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.32
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
</address>
<p>
-Every generation has its philosopher — a writer or an artist who
+Every generation has its philosopher—a writer or an artist who
captures the imagination of a time. Sometimes these philosophers are
recognized as such; often it takes generations before the connection
is made real. But recognized or not, a time gets marked by the people
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
“Code” is the technology that makes computers run. Whether
inscribed in software or burned in hardware, it is the collection of
instructions, first written in words, that directs the functionality
-of machines. These machines — computers — increasingly
+of machines. These machines—computers—increasingly
define and control our life. They determine how phones connect, and
what runs on TV. They decide whether video can be streamed across a
broadband link to a computer. They control what a computer reports
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@
briefs. They can be copied and integrated into another brief or
opinion. The “source code” for American law is by design,
and by principle, open and free for anyone to take. And take lawyers
-do — for it is a measure of a great brief that it achieves its
+do—for it is a measure of a great brief that it achieves its
creativity through the reuse of what happened before. The source is
free; creativity and an economy is built upon it.
</p>
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
flourishes, with later work added to the earlier.
</p>
<p>
-We could imagine a legal practice that was different — briefs
+We could imagine a legal practice that was different—briefs
and arguments that were kept secret; rulings that announced a result
but not the reasoning. Laws that were kept by the police but
published to no one else. Regulation that operated without explaining
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
known, and among these, an especially insightful account of the
changed circumstances that render copyright in the digital world
suspect. They will serve as a resource for those who seek to
-understand the thought of this most powerful man — powerful in
+understand the thought of this most powerful man—powerful in
his ideas, his passion, and his integrity, even if powerless in every
other way. They will inspire others who would take these ideas, and
build upon them.
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@
</p>
<p>
Yet when our world finally comes to understand the power and danger of
-code — when it finally sees that code, like laws, or like
-government, must be transparent to be free — then we will look
+code—when it finally sees that code, like laws, or like
+government, must be transparent to be free—then we will look
back at this uncompromising and persistent programmer and recognize
the vision he has fought to make real: the vision of a world where
freedom and knowledge survives the compiler. And we will come to see
@@ -265,6 +265,23 @@
of this article.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
<p>Copyright © 2002, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -275,7 +292,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/09/05 10:06:09 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000 1.47
+++ po/lessig-fsfs-intro.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.48
@@ -48,12 +48,6 @@
msgstr "por Lawrence Lessig <a href=\"#lessig\"><sup>[*]</sup></a>"
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | Every generation has its [-philosopher — a-] {+philosopher—a+}
-# | writer or an artist who captures the imagination of a time. Sometimes
-# | these philosophers are recognized as such; often it takes generations
-# | before the connection is made real. But recognized or not, a time gets
-# | marked by the people who speak its ideals, whether in the whisper of a
-# | poem, or the blast of a political movement.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Every generation has its philosopher—a writer or an artist who "
@@ -89,15 +83,6 @@
"movimiento por la libertad en un mundo cada vez más marcado por el
«código»."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | “Code” is the technology that makes computers run. Whether
-# | inscribed in software or burned in hardware, it is the collection of
-# | instructions, first written in words, that directs the functionality of
-# | machines. These [-machines — computers — increasingly-]
-# | {+machines—computers—increasingly+} define and control our
-# | life. They determine how phones connect, and what runs on TV. They decide
-# | whether video can be streamed across a broadband link to a computer. They
-# | control what a computer reports back to its manufacturer. These machines
-# | run us. Code runs these machines.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"“Code” is the technology that makes computers run. Whether "
@@ -304,17 +289,6 @@
"determinada ley guarda conformidad con una constitución."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | All the material in this process is free in the sense that Stallman means.
-# | Legal briefs are open and free for others to use. The arguments are
-# | transparent (which is different from saying they are good) and the
-# | reasoning can be taken without the permission of the original lawyers. The
-# | opinions they produce can be quoted in later briefs. They can be copied
-# | and integrated into another brief or opinion. The “source
-# | code” for American law is by design, and by principle, open and free
-# | for anyone to take. And take lawyers [-do — for-] {+do—for+}
-# | it is a measure of a great brief that it achieves its creativity through
-# | the reuse of what happened before. The source is free; creativity and an
-# | economy is built upon it.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"All the material in this process is free in the sense that Stallman means. "
@@ -360,11 +334,6 @@
"anterior."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | We could imagine a legal practice that was [-different — briefs-]
-# | {+different—briefs+} and arguments that were kept secret; rulings
-# | that announced a result but not the reasoning. Laws that were kept by the
-# | police but published to no one else. Regulation that operated without
-# | explaining its rule.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"We could imagine a legal practice that was different—briefs and "
@@ -419,16 +388,6 @@
"recursos más importantes permanecen libres, precisamente en este sentido."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | For the first time, this book collects the writing and lectures of Richard
-# | Stallman in a manner that will make their subtlety and power clear. The
-# | essays span a wide range, from copyright to the history of the free
-# | software movement. They include many arguments not well known, and among
-# | these, an especially insightful account of the changed circumstances that
-# | render copyright in the digital world suspect. They will serve as a
-# | resource for those who seek to understand the thought of this most
-# | powerful [-man — powerful-] {+man—powerful+} in his ideas, his
-# | passion, and his integrity, even if powerless in every other way. They
-# | will inspire others who would take these ideas, and build upon them.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"For the first time, this book collects the writing and lectures of Richard "
@@ -467,14 +426,6 @@
"ante un enemigo. Es inflexible y pertinaz, también perseverante."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | Yet when our world finally comes to understand the power and danger of
-# | [-code — when-] {+code—when+} it finally sees that code, like
-# | laws, or like government, must be transparent to be [-free — then-]
-# | {+free—then+} we will look back at this uncompromising and
-# | persistent programmer and recognize the vision he has fought to make real:
-# | the vision of a world where freedom and knowledge survives the compiler.
-# | And we will come to see that no man, through his deeds or words, has done
-# | as much to make possible the freedom that this next society could have.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Yet when our world finally comes to understand the power and danger of "
@@ -537,8 +488,8 @@
"\" id=\"TransNote1\">[1]</a> En inglés, «free» significa «libre», pero "
"también «gratuito». A causa de esta ambigüedad, la expresión «free
software» "
"a veces es malinterpretada, lo cual no sucede con su equivalente «software "
-"libre» en español. <br /> <a href=\"#TransNote2-rev\" id="
-"\"TransNote2\">[2]</a> En contraposición a trabajo forzado."
+"libre» en español. <br /> <a href=\"#TransNote2-rev\"
id=\"TransNote2\">[2]"
+"</a> En contraposición a trabajo forzado."
# type: Content of: <div><p>
#. type: Content of: <div><div><p>
Index: po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:26 -0000 1.25
+++ po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.26
@@ -11,12 +11,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Lest CodePlex perplex</h2>
<address class="byline">by Richard Stallman</address>
-<div class="article">
<p>Many in our community are suspicious of the CodePlex Foundation. With
its board of directors dominated by Microsoft employees and
ex-employees, plus apologist Miguel de Icaza, there is plenty of
@@ -29,7 +28,7 @@
<p>The first thing we see is that the organization ducks the issue of
users' freedom; it uses the term “open source” and does
-not speak of “free software”. These two terms stand for
+not speak of “free software.” These two terms stand for
different philosophies which are based on different values: free
software's values are freedom and social solidarity, whereas open
source cites only practical convenience values such as powerful,
@@ -46,7 +45,7 @@
<p>CodePlex follows the same practice. Its stated goal is to convince
“commercial software companies” to contribute more to
-“open source”. Since nearly all open source programs are
+“open source.” Since nearly all open source programs are
also free software, these programs will probably be free, but the
“open source” philosophy doesn't teach developers to
defend their freedom. If they don't understand the importance of this
@@ -56,7 +55,7 @@
dependent on proprietary platforms.</p>
<p>This foundation is not the first Microsoft project to bear the name
-“CodePlex”. There is also codeplex.com, a project hosting
+“CodePlex.” There is also codeplex.com, a project hosting
site, whose list of allowed licenses excludes GNU GPL version 3.
Perhaps this reflects the fact that GPL version 3 is designed to
protect a program's free software status from being subverted by
@@ -69,7 +68,7 @@
all software developed by a business—whether free or
proprietary—is automatically commercial software. But there is
a widespread public confusion between “commercial
-software” and “proprietary software”. (See
+software” and “proprietary software.” (See
<a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">
Words to Avoid or Use with Care</a>.)</p>
@@ -132,7 +131,6 @@
continues to act to harm us. We would be fools indeed to let anything
distract us from that.</p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -191,7 +189,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:26 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -b -r1.36 -r1.37
--- po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000 1.36
+++ po/lest-codeplex-perplex.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.37
@@ -61,14 +61,6 @@
"declaraciones y las de Microsoft."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | The first thing we see is that the organization ducks the issue of users'
-# | freedom; it uses the term “open source” and does not speak of
-# | “free [-software”.-] {+software.”+} These two terms
-# | stand for different philosophies which are based on different values: free
-# | software's values are freedom and social solidarity, whereas open source
-# | cites only practical convenience values such as powerful, reliable
-# | software. See <a href=\"/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html\">
-# | Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software</a> for more explanation.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"The first thing we see is that the organization ducks the issue of users' "
@@ -103,16 +95,6 @@
"hace doble trabajo: ataca un oponente mientras distrae la atención del otro."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | CodePlex follows the same practice. Its stated goal is to convince
-# | “commercial software companies” to contribute more to
-# | “open [-source”.-] {+source.”+} Since nearly all open
-# | source programs are also free software, these programs will probably be
-# | free, but the “open source” philosophy doesn't teach
-# | developers to defend their freedom. If they don't understand the
-# | importance of this freedom, developers may succumb to Microsoft's ploys
-# | encouraging them to use weaker licenses that are vulnerable to
-# | “embrace and extend” or patent co-optation, and to make free
-# | software dependent on proprietary platforms.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"CodePlex follows the same practice. Its stated goal is to convince “"
@@ -136,14 +118,6 @@
"plataformas privativas."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | This foundation is not the first Microsoft project to bear the name
-# | [-“CodePlex”.-] {+“CodePlex.”+} There is also
-# | codeplex.com, a project hosting site, whose list of allowed licenses
-# | excludes GNU GPL version 3. Perhaps this reflects the fact that GPL
-# | version 3 is designed to protect a program's free software status from
-# | being subverted by Microsoft's patents through deals like the
-# | Novell-Microsoft pact. We don't know that the CodePlex Foundation will
-# | try to discourage GPL version 3, but it would fit Microsoft's pattern.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"This foundation is not the first Microsoft project to bear the name “"
@@ -164,14 +138,6 @@
"pero encajarÃa en el patrón de Microsoft."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | The term “commercial software companies” embodies a peculiar
-# | confusion. Every business is by definition commercial, so all software
-# | developed by a business—whether free or proprietary—is
-# | automatically commercial software. But there is a widespread public
-# | confusion between “commercial software” and “proprietary
-# | [-software”.-] {+software.”+} (See <a
-# | href=\"/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html\"> Words to Avoid or Use with
-# | Care</a>.)
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"The term “commercial software companies” embodies a peculiar "
Index: po/linux-gnu-freedom.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/linux-gnu-freedom.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- po/linux-gnu-freedom.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:26 -0000 1.28
+++ po/linux-gnu-freedom.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.29
@@ -13,12 +13,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Linux, GNU, and Freedom</h2>
<address class="byline">by Richard M. Stallman</address>
-<div class="article">
<p>
Since <a
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190404115541/http://linux.sys-con.com/node/32755";>Joe
Barr's
@@ -28,10 +27,10 @@
<p>
When SIGLINUX invited me to speak, it was a “Linux User
Group”; that is, a group for users of the GNU/Linux system
- which calls the whole system “Linux”. So I replied
+ which calls the whole system “Linux.” So I replied
politely that if they'd like someone from the GNU Project to give a
speech for them, they ought to treat the GNU Project right, and call
- the system “GNU/Linux”. The system is a variant of GNU,
+ the system “GNU/Linux.” The system is a variant of GNU,
and the GNU Project is its principal developer, so social convention
says to call it by the name we chose. Unless there are powerful
reasons for an exception, I usually decline to give speeches for
@@ -44,14 +43,14 @@
user groups. Our webmaster told him that we would not list it under
the name “SIGLINUX” because that name implies that the
group is about Linux. Strunk proposed to change the name to
- “SIGFREE”, and our webmaster agreed that would be fine.
+ “SIGFREE,” and our webmaster agreed that would be fine.
(Barr's article said we rejected this proposal.) However, the group
- ultimately decided to stay with “SIGLINUX”.</p>
+ ultimately decided to stay with “SIGLINUX.”</p>
<p>
At that point, the matter came to my attention again, and I
suggested they consider other possible names. There are many names
they could choose that would not call the system
- “Linux”, and I hope they will come up with one they
+ “Linux,” and I hope they will come up with one they
like. There the matter rests as far as I know.</p>
<p>
Is it true, as Barr writes, that some people see these actions as an
@@ -80,10 +79,10 @@
about the GNU Project and think them justified; his fellows will
support him, because they want each other's support in maintaining
their prejudice. Dissenters can be reviled; thus, if I decline to
- participate in an activity under the rubric of “Linux”,
+ participate in an activity under the rubric of “Linux,”
they may find that inexcusable, and hold me responsible for the ill
will they feel afterwards. When so many people want me to call the
- system “Linux”, how can I, who merely launched its
+ system “Linux,” how can I, who merely launched its
development, not comply? And forcibly denying them a speech is
forcibly making them unhappy. That's coercion, as bad as
Microsoft!</p>
@@ -130,8 +129,8 @@
Will enough of us care? That depends on many things; among them,
how much influence the GNU Project has, and how much influence Linus
Torvalds has. The GNU Project says, “Value your
- freedom!”. Joe Barr says, “Choose between nonfree and
- free programs on technical grounds alone!”. If people credit
+ freedom!.” Joe Barr says, “Choose between nonfree and
+ free programs on technical grounds alone!.” If people credit
Torvalds as the main developer of the GNU/Linux system, that's not
just inaccurate, it also makes his message more
influential—and that message says, “Nonfree software is
@@ -238,7 +237,6 @@
Linux</a> is now maintained for use in free GNU/Linux
distributions.</p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -269,6 +267,23 @@
information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
<p>Copyright © 2002, 2021 Richard M. Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -279,7 +294,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:26 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/linux-gnu-freedom.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/linux-gnu-freedom.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- po/linux-gnu-freedom.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000 1.44
+++ po/linux-gnu-freedom.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.45
@@ -69,18 +69,6 @@
"explicar mis motivos."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | When SIGLINUX invited me to speak, it was a “Linux User
-# | Group”; that is, a group for users of the GNU/Linux system which
-# | calls the whole system [-“Linux”.-] {+“Linux.”+}
-# | So I replied politely that if they'd like someone from the GNU Project to
-# | give a speech for them, they ought to treat the GNU Project right, and
-# | call the system [-“GNU/Linux”.-] {+“GNU/Linux.”+}
-# | The system is a variant of GNU, and the GNU Project is its principal
-# | developer, so social convention says to call it by the name we chose.
-# | Unless there are powerful reasons for an exception, I usually decline to
-# | give speeches for organizations that won't give GNU proper credit in this
-# | way. I respect their freedom of speech, but I also have the freedom not
-# | to give a speech.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"When SIGLINUX invited me to speak, it was a “Linux User Group”; "
@@ -107,15 +95,6 @@
"darles una charla."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | Subsequently, Jeff Strunk of SIGLINUX tried to change the group's policy,
-# | and asked the FSF to list his group in our page of GNU/Linux user groups.
-# | Our webmaster told him that we would not list it under the name
-# | “SIGLINUX” because that name implies that the group is about
-# | Linux. Strunk proposed to change the name to [-“SIGFREE”,-]
-# | {+“SIGFREE,”+} and our webmaster agreed that would be fine.
-# | (Barr's article said we rejected this proposal.) However, the group
-# | ultimately decided to stay with [-“SIGLINUX”.-]
-# | {+“SIGLINUX.”+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Subsequently, Jeff Strunk of SIGLINUX tried to change the group's policy, "
@@ -137,11 +116,6 @@
"seguir llamándose «SIGLINUX»."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | At that point, the matter came to my attention again, and I suggested they
-# | consider other possible names. There are many names they could choose
-# | that would not call the system [-“Linux”,-]
-# | {+“Linux,”+} and I hope they will come up with one they like.
-# | There the matter rests as far as I know.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"At that point, the matter came to my attention again, and I suggested they "
@@ -203,17 +177,6 @@
"para juzgarnos mal tan drásticamente."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | A person who is that prejudiced can say all sorts of unfair things about
-# | the GNU Project and think them justified; his fellows will support him,
-# | because they want each other's support in maintaining their prejudice.
-# | Dissenters can be reviled; thus, if I decline to participate in an
-# | activity under the rubric of [-“Linux”,-]
-# | {+“Linux,”+} they may find that inexcusable, and hold me
-# | responsible for the ill will they feel afterwards. When so many people
-# | want me to call the system [-“Linux”,-]
-# | {+“Linux,”+} how can I, who merely launched its development,
-# | not comply? And forcibly denying them a speech is forcibly making them
-# | unhappy. That's coercion, as bad as Microsoft!
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"A person who is that prejudiced can say all sorts of unfair things about the "
@@ -325,19 +288,6 @@
"protegerla."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | Will enough of us care? That depends on many things; among them, how much
-# | influence the GNU Project has, and how much influence Linus Torvalds has.
-# | The GNU Project says, “Value your [-freedom!”.-]
-# | {+freedom!.”+} Joe Barr says, “Choose between nonfree and free
-# | programs on technical grounds [-alone!”.-] {+alone!.”+} If
-# | people credit Torvalds as the main developer of the GNU/Linux system,
-# | that's not just inaccurate, it also makes his message more
-# | influential—and that message says, “Nonfree software is OK; I
-# | use it and develop it myself.” If they recognize our role, they will
-# | listen to us more, and the message we will give them is, “This
-# | system exists because of people who care about freedom. Join us, value
-# | your freedom, and together we can preserve it.” See <a
-# | href=\"/gnu/thegnuproject.html\">The GNU Project</a> for the history.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Will enough of us care? That depends on many things; among them, how much "
Index: po/microsoft-antitrust.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-antitrust.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- po/microsoft-antitrust.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:26 -0000 1.14
+++ po/microsoft-antitrust.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.15
@@ -10,17 +10,16 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>The Microsoft Antitrust Trial and Free Software</h2>
<div class="thin"></div>
-<div class="article">
<p>
With the Microsoft antitrust trial moving toward a conclusion, the
question of what to demand of Microsoft if it loses is coming to the
fore. Ralph Nader is even [when this was written, in March 1999]
organizing a conference about the question (see
-<a
href="http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/";>http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/</a>).</p>
+<a
href="http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/";>appraising-microsoft.org</a>).</p>
<p>
The obvious answers—to restrict contracts between Microsoft and
computer manufacturers, or to break up the company—will not make
@@ -120,7 +119,6 @@
us to develop a truly superior alternative to Microsoft Windows,
in whatever area Microsoft does not make Windows free software.</p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -179,7 +177,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:26 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/microsoft-antitrust.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-antitrust.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- po/microsoft-antitrust.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000 1.21
+++ po/microsoft-antitrust.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.22
@@ -32,13 +32,6 @@
msgid "The Microsoft Antitrust Trial and Free Software"
msgstr "El software libre y el juicio antimonopolio contra Microsoft"
-# | With the Microsoft antitrust trial moving toward a conclusion, the
-# | question of what to demand of Microsoft if it loses is coming to the fore.
-# | Ralph Nader is even [when this was written, in March 1999] organizing a
-# | conference about the question (see <a
-# |
[-href=\"http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/\";>http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/</a>).-]
-# | {+href=\"http://www.appraising-microsoft.org/\";>appraising-microsoft.org</a
-# | >).+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"With the Microsoft antitrust trial moving toward a conclusion, the question "
Index: po/microsoft-old.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- po/microsoft-old.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:26 -0000 1.6
+++ po/microsoft-old.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.7
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Is Microsoft the Great Satan? (Old Version)</h2>
<div class="announcement">
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
</div>
<hr class="thin" />
-<div class="article">
<p>Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the software
industry. There is even a campaign to boycott Microsoft. This feeling
has intensified since Microsoft expressed active hostility towards
@@ -42,7 +41,7 @@
software. At the FSF, we don't run any proprietary software—not
from Microsoft or anyone else.</p>
-<p>In the “Halloween documents”, released at the end of
+<p>In the “Halloween documents,” released at the end of
October 1998, Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various
methods to obstruct the development of free software: specifically,
designing secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms
@@ -54,7 +53,7 @@
seems, we are among the intended targets. But that change in
motivation has no practical consequence, because secret conventions
and software patents obstruct everyone, regardless of the
-“intended target”.</p>
+“intended target.”</p>
<p>Secrecy and patents do threaten free software. They have obstructed
us greatly in the past, and we must expect they will do so even more
@@ -66,7 +65,6 @@
<p>Thank you, Microsoft, and please get out of the way.</p>
</div>
-</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -124,7 +122,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:26 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/microsoft-old.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- po/microsoft-old.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000 1.17
+++ po/microsoft-old.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000 1.18
@@ -94,11 +94,6 @@
"privativo. En la FSF no utilizamos software privativo alguno, ni de "
"Microsoft ni de nadie."
-# | In the “Halloween [-documents”,-] {+documents,”+}
-# | released at the end of October 1998, Microsoft executives stated an
-# | intention to use various methods to obstruct the development of free
-# | software: specifically, designing secret protocols and file formats, and
-# | patenting algorithms and software features.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"In the “Halloween documents,” released at the end of October "
@@ -112,13 +107,6 @@
"diseñando protocolos y formatos de archivos secretos, y patentando "
"algoritmos y caracterÃsticas de software."
-# | These obstructionist policies are nothing new: Microsoft, and many other
-# | software companies, have been doing them for years now. In the past,
-# | probably, their motivation was to attack each other; now, it seems, we are
-# | among the intended targets. But that change in motivation has no practical
-# | consequence, because secret conventions and software patents obstruct
-# | everyone, regardless of the “intended [-target”.-]
-# | {+target.”+}
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"These obstructionist policies are nothing new: Microsoft, and many other "
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.53
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -b -r1.53 -r1.54
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html 19 Aug 2021 08:13:27 -0000
1.53
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000
1.54
@@ -10,12 +10,11 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
-<div class="reduced-width">
+<div class="article reduced-width">
<h2>Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software</h2>
<address class="byline">by Richard Stallman</address>
-<div class="article">
<div class="important"><p>
The terms “free software” and “open
source” stand for almost the same range of programs. However,
@@ -47,7 +46,7 @@
operating system</a>. Most of these users, however, have never heard of
the ethical reasons for which we developed this system and built the free
software community, because nowadays this system and community are more
-often spoken of as “open source”, attributing them to a
+often spoken of as “open source,” attributing them to a
different philosophy in which these freedoms are hardly mentioned.</p>
<p>The free software movement has campaigned for computer users'
@@ -112,7 +111,7 @@
want people to know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being
mislabeled as open source supporters. What we advocate is not
“open source,” and what we oppose is not “closed
-source”. To make this clear, we avoid using those terms.
+source.” To make this clear, we avoid using those terms.
</p>
<h3>Practical Differences between Free Software and Open Source</h3>
@@ -140,7 +139,7 @@
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants”, and the
+capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,” and the
practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
@@ -246,7 +245,7 @@
criteria for software licensing are simply not pertinent. The only
thing these activities have in common is that they somehow invite
people to participate. They stretch the term so far that it only
-means “participatory” or “transparent”, or
+means “participatory” or “transparent,” or
less than that. At worst, it
has <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/opinion/sunday/morozov-open-and-closed.html";>
become a vacuous buzzword</a>.</p>
@@ -435,7 +434,6 @@
than ever. Every time you say “free software” rather than
“open source,” you help our cause.</p>
<div class="column-limit"></div>
-</div>
<h3 class="footnote">Note</h3>
@@ -486,6 +484,23 @@
of this article.</p>
</div>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
<p>Copyright © 2007, 2010, 2012-2016, 2019-2021 Richard Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -496,7 +511,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2021/08/19 08:13:27 $
+$Date: 2021/09/13 09:03:41 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.132
retrieving revision 1.133
diff -u -b -r1.132 -r1.133
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 13 Sep 2021 08:43:20 -0000
1.132
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 13 Sep 2021 09:03:41 -0000
1.133
@@ -95,15 +95,6 @@
"esencial para la libertad en general."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | Tens of millions of people around the world now use free software; the
-# | public schools of some regions of India and Spain now teach all students
-# | to use the free <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux operating
-# | system</a>. Most of these users, however, have never heard of the ethical
-# | reasons for which we developed this system and built the free software
-# | community, because nowadays this system and community are more often
-# | spoken of as “open [-source”,-] {+source,”+} attributing
-# | them to a different philosophy in which these freedoms are hardly
-# | mentioned.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Tens of millions of people around the world now use free software; the "
@@ -254,12 +245,6 @@
"expresión «software libre»."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | We in the free software movement don't think of the open source camp as an
-# | enemy; the enemy is proprietary (nonfree) software. But we want people to
-# | know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being mislabeled as open
-# | source supporters. What we advocate is not “open source,” and
-# | what we oppose is not “closed [-source”.-] {+source.”+}
-# | To make this clear, we avoid using those terms.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"We in the free software movement don't think of the open source camp as an "
@@ -325,16 +310,6 @@
"ese caso los usuarios pueden compilar el código fuente para crear y "
"distribuir ejecutables libres."
-# | Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing
-# | computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-# | from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-# | make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-# | capabilities. We call these devices [-“tyrants”,-]
-# | {+“tyrants,”+} and the practice is called
-# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
-# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally
-# | carries a free license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
-# | the executable is de-facto nonfree.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
@@ -571,16 +546,6 @@
"GPL de GNU."
# type: Content of: <p>
-# | The term “open source” has been further stretched by its
-# | application to other activities, such as government, education, and
-# | science, where there is no such thing as source code, and where criteria
-# | for software licensing are simply not pertinent. The only thing these
-# | activities have in common is that they somehow invite people to
-# | participate. They stretch the term so far that it only means
-# | “participatory” or [-“transparent”,-]
-# | {+“transparent,”+} or less than that. At worst, it has <a
-# |
href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/opinion/sunday/morozov-open-and-closed.html\";>
-# | become a vacuous buzzword</a>.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"The term “open source” has been further stretched by its "
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy gpl-american-dream.es.html gpl-a...,
GNUN <=