www/distros optionally-free-not-enough.fr.html ...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     21/04/29 06:00:57

Modified files:
        distros        : optionally-free-not-enough.fr.html 
        distros/po     : optionally-free-not-enough.fr-en.html 
                         optionally-free-not-enough.fr.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/optionally-free-not-enough.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9

Patches:
Index: optionally-free-not-enough.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/optionally-free-not-enough.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- optionally-free-not-enough.fr.html  19 May 2015 06:00:29 -0000      1.21
+++ optionally-free-not-enough.fr.html  29 Apr 2021 10:00:55 -0000      1.22
@@ -20,28 +20,44 @@
 <p>Les distributions qui proposent cette option sont clairement meilleures que
 celles qui ne la proposent pas. Mais cette option ne suffit pas à les rendre
 recommandables d'une manière générale. Après tout, la plupart des gens de
-notre communauté ne sont pas conscients du problème. Nous ne pouvons pas
-nous attendre à ce qu'ils rejettent en masse le logiciel non libre pour la
-simple raison qu'une distribution propose un moyen de le faire.</p>
+notre communauté ne sont pas conscients du problème. Nous n'attendons pas de
+la majorité d'entre eux qu'ils choisissent de rejeter le logiciel non libre
+pour la simple raison qu'une distribution propose un moyen de le faire. Nous
+ne voulons pas non plus amener les gens à en installer. Les pratiques que
+nous avons établies ont pour but de rendre ceci peu probable.</p>
 
-<p>Par conséquent, lorsque nous envisageons de recommander une distribution,
-nous devons nous demander à qui. Ce pourrait être par exemple :</p>
+<p>Ainsi, la décision de recommander une distribution dépend de la personne 
à 
+qui on s'adresse. Ce pourrait être par exemple :</p>
 
 <ol>
 <li>Des partisans engagés du logiciel libre, triés sur le volet, dont nous
 savons qu'ils feront un effort pour éviter le logiciel non libre.</li>
 
-<li>Un groupe nombreux comme par exemple le grand public.</li>
+<li>Un groupe nombreux et divers comme, par exemple, le grand public.</li>
 </ol>
 
-<p>Dans le premier cas, nous pourrions recommander la distribution si elle
-proposait un moyen clair et fiable de rejeter le logiciel non libre.</p>
-
-<p>Toutefois, pour recommander une distribution au grand public, il nous faut
-rester intransigeants sur notre critère effectif : un engagement explicite à 
-ne pas proposer ni suggérer de programme non libre, quel qu'il soit. De
-cette façon, nous savons que la distribution n'amènera pas le public à en
-installer.</p>
+<p>Nous pouvons recommander cette distribution en privé aux personnes du
+premier groupe si elle propose un moyen clair et fiable de rejeter le
+logiciel non libre.</p>
+
+<p>Toutefois, quand il s'agit de recommander une distribution au grand public,
+on doit rester intransigeant (et c'est ce que nous faisons) sur son
+engagement explicite à ne pas proposer ni suggérer de programme non libre,
+quel qu'il soit. De cette façon, nous savons que cette recommandation
+n'amènera pas le public à en installer.</p>
+
+<p>Quelles distributions les install parties doivent-elles recommander ou
+installer pour le public ? D'un point de vue éthique, elles ne doivent pas
+recommander ni installer de programme non libre. Cependant, les gens vont
+apporter des ordinateurs qui ont besoin de pilotes non libres ou de blobs de
+microcode pour fonctionner. Sans eux, ils s'en iront désappointés et
+considérerons GNU/Linux comme un échec.</p>
+
+<p>Nous avons eu une idée pour réconcilier ces deux nécessités : l'install
+party installe une distribution libre, puis le « <a
+href="/philosophy/install-fest-devil.html">diable</a> » (une personne
+portant un masque de diable) propose d'installer les pilotes non libres ou
+les blobs dont la machine a besoin.</p>
 
 <div class="translators-notes">
 
@@ -87,7 +103,7 @@
 
 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -101,13 +117,13 @@
      
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2014, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Cette page peut être utilisée suivant les conditions de la licence <a
 rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.fr";>Creative
-Commons attribution de paternité, pas de modification, 3.0 États-Unis
-(CCÂ BY-ND 3.0Â US)</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.fr";>Creative
+Commons attribution, pas de modification, 4.0Â internationale (CCÂ BY-ND
+4.0)</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.fr.html" -->
 <div class="translators-credits">
@@ -119,7 +135,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2015/05/19 06:00:29 $
+$Date: 2021/04/29 10:00:55 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr-en.html    12 Apr 2014 13:52:51 -0000      
1.17
+++ po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr-en.html    29 Apr 2021 10:00:56 -0000      
1.18
@@ -8,32 +8,48 @@
 <p>There are distros we decline to recommend that offer the user the 
 option of installing only free software.  Given that option, a user 
 who values freedom strongly enough, and thinks about the issue, can 
-make those distros respect her freedom.</p>
+make those distros respect per freedom.</p>
 
-<p>A distro that offers that option is clearly better than one that fails 
-to offer that option.  But that option does not make the distro ok to 
-recommend in general.  After all, most people in our community are not 
-conscious of this issue.  We cannot expect most of them to reject 
-nonfree software just because the distro offers a way to do so.</p>
-
-<p>So if we are considering whether to recommend a distro, 
-we need to consider who we would recommend it to.  For instance, 
-it could be:</p>
+<p>A distro that offers that option is clearly better than one that
+fails to offer that option.  But that option does not make the distro
+ok to recommend in general.  After all, most people in our community
+are not conscious of this issue.  We cannot expect most of them to
+choose to reject nonfree software just because the distro offers a way
+to do so.  And we don't want to lead people to install nonfree
+software.  We've chosen our practices to make that unlikely.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, our decision about recommending a distro depends on who we
+would recommend it to.  For instance, it could be:</p>
 
 <ol>
 <li>Specific committed free software supporters that we know will
 make an effort to avoid nonfree software.</li>
 
-<li>A large group such as perhaps the general public.</li>
+<li>A large and diverse group, such as, perhaps. the public in general.</li>
 </ol>
 
-<p>For the first case, we could recommend the distro if the distro 
-provides a clear and reliable way to reject nonfree software.</p>
-
-<p>However, for recommending a distro to the general public, we need to 
-insist on the criteria we actually use: an explicit commitment not to 
-offer or suggest any nonfree programs.  That way, we know the distro 
-won't lead the public to install any of those.</p>
+<p>We could recommend the distro privately to people in that first
+group if the distro provides a clear and reliable way to reject
+nonfree software.</p>
+
+<p>However, when it comes to recommending a distro to the general
+public, we should insist (and we do insist) on an explicit commitment
+not to offer or suggest any nonfree programs.  That way, we know our
+recommendation of that distro won't lead the public to install any of
+those.</p>
+
+<p>What distros should an install fest recommend or install for the
+public?  On moral grounds, an install fest should not recommend or
+install nonfree programs.  However, people will bring computers that
+need nonfree drivers or firmware blobs in order to run at
+all&mdash;without those, they will go away disappointed and consider
+GNU/Linux a failure.</p>
+
+<p>We thought of an idea for how to reconcile these two needs: the
+install fest installs a free distro,
+then <a href="/philosophy/install-fest-devil.html">&ldquo;the
+devil&rdquo; (a person wearing a devil mask) offers to install the
+nonfree drivers or blobs that machine needs</a>.</p>
 
 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -67,7 +83,7 @@
 
 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
-     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -82,17 +98,17 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2014, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:52:51 $
+$Date: 2021/04/29 10:00:56 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr.po 29 Apr 2021 09:33:27 -0000      1.8
+++ po/optionally-free-not-enough.fr.po 29 Apr 2021 10:00:56 -0000      1.9
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
 "NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>."
 msgstr ""
 "Cette page peut être utilisée suivant les conditions de la licence <a rel="
-"\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.fr";
+"\"license\" href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.fr";
 "\">Creative Commons attribution, pas de modification, 4.0Â internationale "
 "(CCÂ BY-ND 4.0)</a>."